Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Rank Transfers

  1. #1
    Inactive Member Greg Crawford's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 6th, 2002
    Posts
    603
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Would it not be cheaper to transfer your 16 mm negative footage first to a color corrected print....then rank it in near one to one time ...cutting cost. 16 mm scene to scene corrected work print is .36 cent per foot around hear.

    Neg development is high about .19 per foot in Detroit and .03 per foot for cleaning and prep.

    If not one to one, what do you think1.5/1?
    2-1??

    Sorry I don't think this will work in Super 8, since know one makes transfers anymore to print stock.

  2. #2
    HB Forum Moderator Alex's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 29th, 2000
    Posts
    11,383
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    I bet Nigel would know the answer. [img]graemlins/wonder.gif[/img]

  3. #3
    Inactive Member Greg Crawford's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 6th, 2002
    Posts
    603
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Alex,

    Your right, Nigel did have some good advice. Seems there no free lunch. I'll have to go directly from the neg to the Rank and expect a 3 to 1 ratio.

    The problem is stock footage is paid on usage and some can be big ticket paychecks others are would not cover the film and development charge, yet alone the transfer cost.

    More and more the stock request are for HD or 35mm neg. (That also means supply a video copy) pushing the cost way up there. I was looking for a way to shoot in Super 16 and keep the cost down on supplying a video copy.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •